- Analysis (1)
- Assessments/Surveys (1)
- Awareness (12)
- BS (19)
- Computer Intrusions (3)
- Conferences (7)
- Countermeasures (4)
- Critical Information (9)
- Critical Information Lists (2)
- Family OPSEC (9)
- General OPSEC (29)
- History (6)
- Indicators (3)
- Leadership Support (2)
- Media (7)
- Movies (4)
- OPSEC Plans (2)
- OSPA (9)
- Planning (3)
- Program Management (11)
- Risk (7)
- Threat (8)
- Uncategorized (8)
- Vulnerabilities (6)
- WWW (11)
- 21. December 2010: I Am OPSEC
- 15. October 2010: Idiot Wind
- 4. October 2010: National OPSEC Day
- 13. August 2010: Smells Like Teen Spirit
- 9. August 2010: The Sky Is Crying
- 19. July 2010: Memory Motel
- 25. May 2010: Memorial Day
- 16. April 2010: Wheelbarrow Blues
- 14. April 2010: A Change Is Gonna Come
- 5. February 2010: Who Wrote The Book Of Love
- December 2010
- October 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- February 2010
- December 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
OPSEC In The Movies
Does Hollywood do a good job of portraying OPSEC in the movies? Can anyone provide a movie and describe a scene where OPSEC comes into play? Was it good OPSEC or was it poor OPSEC? I don’t really care if it was good or poor acting.
One that comes to mind for me is the movie “MIDWAY” which came out in the summer of 1976 and is available on DVD. It tells the tale about “the most decisive naval battle in U.S. history” which turned the tide of the war in the Pacific. Directed by Jack Smight, it has an ALL STAR cast: Charlton Heston, James Coburn, Henry Fonda, Glenn Ford, Hal Holbrook, Pat Morita, Robert Mitchum, Cliff Robertson, Robert Wagner, Toshiro Mifune, James Shigeta, Christina Kokubo, Edward Albert (the son of Eddie Albert), and - if you look close enough - Tom Selleck (a.k.a. Magnum P.I.).
At the risk of turning this into a movie critic forum or movie trivia challenge, I thought the movie did a pretty good job of historically portraying this watershed event. It was also really fun if you got to see it in theaters enabled with “SENSOR-ROUND!”
Two items of OPSEC significance come to mind:
“AF is Midway” Does anyone know the movie well enough to know what I am referring to? Some might call this a feedback loop. The scene is where we employ poor OPSEC in a smart manner…in a “Measurement of Effectiveness” sort of way…to use to our advantage. When we get to this scene, the film establishes that we are “copying the Japanese mail” but the US is not quite sure what their intentions are for Midway. Maybe it would all become clear if they could just figure out what the two letter abbreviation “AF” refers to in the enemy’s message traffic.
Commander Joseph Rochefort, a US Navy Intel officer (a crypie) played by Hal Holbrook, convinces Admiral Nimitz, played by Henry Fonda, to buy off on a little ploy to have the comms center on Midway Island send out a “fake message” in the clear about a degrading fresh water situation on Midway. Admiral Nimitz gives the okay. Ultimately – just a minute or so in movie time, Commander Rochefort and his personnel intercept and de-code a Japanese message that confirms that “AF” is indeed Midway.
Could you consider this a nice OPSEC coup? Maybe a small victory for OPSEC? If nothing else, it clearly demonstrates that the enemy was listening…and something like that could be useful in reinforcing OPSEC awareness; then and now.
“Admiral Nimitz is notified” What happens next is my favorite OPSEC moment in the film. Just seconds after CDR Rochefort – Hal Holbrook - gets the news confirming “AF” is Midway, he turns to Charlton Heston, playing the fictional character of Captain Matt Garth, and relays the information. Charlton Heston is then sprayed with water from a fire hose and exclaims that the place is a “madhouse!”
Oops, sorry; wrong movie.
Charlton Heston quickly rushes to the nearest telephone…still within easy earshot of the Intel crew who just broke the message traffic…to call Admiral Nimitz.
Can you say “phone’s up” or “this line is not secure”? Well, neither could Mr. Heston or Mr. Fonda; maybe it just wasn’t in the script. Captain Garth tells Admiral Nimitz that Intel has confirmed that “AF is Midway” over the telephone. Was this poor OPSEC? I don’t think so; this was a security violation plain and simple not to mention just poor headwork. Of course CDR Rochefort was too busy celebrating with his shipmates to admonish the good Captain on his security procedures.
Upon hearing the news, Admiral Nimitz requests that Captain Garth assemble the staff at a particular time the next morning to begin planning. Was this critical information? I’d say sure! This part of the scene is an example of poor OPSEC.
Anyway, I doubt Hollywood was thinking about the finer points of good OPSEC when they were striving for historical accuracy combined with dramatic effect. The take-away here is that you can use this 2 – 3 minute scene to improve your own organization’s OPSEC awareness thanks to Hollywood’s literary license.
For those of you who have seen the movie, what do you think? Please share other films and movie scenes that directly or indirectly involve OPSEC.
You can get more details about the “AF is Midway” ploy, by searching Commander Joseph Rochefort on the web.
Don Sidro - The GodFather of OPSEC
19. November 2007 at 23:27
There are many but I gotta tell ya - I can’t watch an episode of “24″ without dreaming of getting these folks into a room for the OPSEC wall-to-wall counselling.
20. November 2007 at 00:08
Great example of OPSEC in the silver screen. I submit my example for the OPSEC movie goer.
A great example of protecting critical information can be found in the 1965 movie, Battle of the Bulge, starring Henry Fonda (again) and Robert Shaw, as well as a host of others.
The scenes I refer to are when Henry Fonda, a police detective turned intelligence officer, discovers a key piece of critical information that the Germans: their lack of fuel reserves.
At the beginning of the film, a German general officer points out to COL Hessler (Robert Shaw) a giant clock that will count down from 50 hours and explains that if they haven’t taken Antwerp by this time all of their supplies will be exhausted (a key piece of critical information if ever I saw one!).
In the course of his intelligence duties, Henry Fonda observed that the German’s fuel drums floated when accidentally dropped in water. By combining this with other “pieces of the puzzle” such as the fact that German POWs were found to be carrying rubber hoses, he determined that the Germans were running low on fuel and having to siphon fuel on the battlefield. This discovery of their vulnerability led him to deduce that the German’s objective was a certain fuel depot. With the help of Telly Savalas and Charles Bronson, he blows the dump and almost singlehandedly stops the “Bulge”.
While oversimplifying the actual Battle of the Bulge, it does show how the loss of critical information can highlight vulnerabilities that when exploited can result in a failed mission.
Ollie
12. December 2007 at 21:17
More of a family or personal OPSEC example that I remember from a movie comes from Home Alone. The part where the robbers had created a profile of the neighborhood, and knew who was and wasn’t home based on the timers for their lights on the homes. More of a cheesy example, but our adversaries use the same techniques to put profiles together on us. The “5 characteristics of an indicator”, Signature, Association, Profile, Contrast and Exposure…