13. June 2008 by Revelator.

     A number of you have emailed me asking what is up with the entry titles so I figured I would explain.  For no real reason what-so-ever I began using song titles as titles for my entries.  The problem (apparently) is that not all readers know who performed the songs and I keep getting emails asking about the artist so I decided I would take some time and fill you in on the past artists starting with the title on this entry and working backward.  In the future I will include the artists name at the end of the entry for you curious few out there.

What’s Going On - Marvin Gaye

The Message - Grandmaster Flash and The Furious Five

Hot For Teacher - Van Halen

Welcome To The Jungle - Guns and Roses

You Can’t Always Get What You Want - Rolling Stones

Friends In Low Places - Garth Brooks

Purple Rain - Prince

Tumbling Dice - Rolling Stones

Thunder Road - Bruce Springsteen and The E Street Band

Reveloution #9 - Beatles

Here Comes The Sun - Beatles

Keep the Faith!

Revelator

Posted in BS | Print | 5 Comments »

13. June 2008 by Revelator.

     Hear ye!  Hear ye!  Hear ye!  I’ve got a message for you.  It’s not the most important one I’ll ever give or the best written one I’ve ever given but it does go to the heart of an argument that has been raging since the early ’70’s.  And the question is this: How long should a Critical Information List (CIL) be?

     The best CIL I’ve ever seen was in an organization that required all personnel to wear badges within the confines of the building.  The organization took their 12-item CIL - I say again their 12-item CIL - put it on a card and laminated it for all personnel to wear with their identification badge.  Each person in the organization had access to the CIL at all times.  This is about as good as it gets folks.

     On the other hand, a good number of seasoned OPSEC professionals disagree with me on this subject.  They’ll tell you that a “comprehensive” CIL is the only way to ensure that all of your critical information will be protected.  Sound logic to be sure.  Unless you take into account the human factor.  I don’t know how many of you have photographic memories and can remember a 73, or 103 or 276 item CIL, but I sure can’t.  276 items!  Are you freaking kidding me?  How is this usable?  My personal experience is that when I’m shown a CIL with more items than my wife’s grocery list I tend to ignore it.  I know I can’t memorize it and if I’m on the phone or typing an email I most likely won’t consult the “Big Book of CILs” to see if I should be communicating the information.  But if you show me a list that I can wrap my brain around, say about 20 items, then I’ll study that sucker and be able to commit most of it to memory.  And even if I can’t memorize it I can pin it up somewhere in my cubicle where I can actually consult it quickly if need be.

     There are too many things in our complicated lives to remember already.  I’m forever writing things on sticky’s so I don’t forget them.  Then I’ve got the task list in my Microsoft Outlook so I don’t forget anything.  I’ve also got a long to-do list in my 7-Habits Daily Planner which is also loaded onto my Blackberry and then as a fail safe, I’ve got my wife around who is constantly reminding me of things I’ve already forgotten.  And when I do make it to the grocery store my wife will make a list for me because she just knows I’ll forget something.

     And finally on the subject of short CIL’s - remember the KISS Principle - Keep It Simple Stupid.  The shortest Critical Information List I ever saw had only one item.  “We are a military organization charged with protecting the freedom of the American peoples and their allies - keep your damn mouth shut!”  I could argue that there should probably me a couple of more items but damn it - I like their attitude.

Keep the Faith!

Revelator

Posted in Program Management, General OPSEC | Print | 2 Comments »